Facebook Instagram Youtube Twitter

Nuclear Shell Model – Shell Model of Nucleus

In nuclear physics, the nuclear shell model is a theoretical model to describe the atomic nucleus. In this model, nucleons are added to shells which increase with energy that orbit around a central potential.

The nuclear shell model is a theoretical model to describe the atomic nucleus in nuclear physics. The nuclear shell model was proposed by Dmitry Ivanenko in 1932 and further developed independently by several physicists such as Maria Goeppert-Mayer, Eugene Paul Wigner, and J. Hans D. Jensen in 1949. It must be noted this model is based on the Pauli exclusion principle to describe the structure of the nucleus in terms of energy levels.

Shell model of nucleusThe nuclear shell model is partly analogous to the atomic shell model, which describes the arrangement of electrons in an atom in that filled shell results in greater stability. Nucleons are added to shells which increase with energy that orbit around a central potential. In the atomic shell model, the central potential around which the nucleus generates the electrons orbit. Nucleons are added to shells which increase with energy that orbit around a central potential.

Compared to the atomic shell model, the atomic nucleus is governed by two different forces. The residual strong force, also known as the nuclear force, holds neutrons and protons together in nuclei. In nuclei, this force acts against the enormous repulsive electromagnetic force of the protons. The term residual is associated with the fact that it is the residuum of the fundamental strong interaction between the quarks that make up the protons and neutrons. The strong interaction is a very complicated interaction because it significantly varies with distance. At distances comparable to the diameter of a proton, the strong force is approximately 100 times as strong as the electromagnetic force. However, at smaller distances, the strong force between quarks becomes weaker, and the quarks begin to behave like independent particles. In particle physics, this effect is known as asymptotic freedom.

With the enormous strong force acting between individual nucleons and so many nucleons to collide with, how can nucleons orbit a central potential without interacting? This problem is explained by the Pauli exclusion principle, which states that two fermions cannot occupy the same quantum state. In other words, the interaction will not occur if the higher energy shells are fully occupied, and the energy imparted to the nucleon during the collision is insufficient to promote the nucleon to an unfilled orbit. As a result, the nucleons orbit independently of one another.

The nuclear shell model described many phenomena like the magic numbers, the ground state spin, parity, etc.

Magic Numbers of Protons and Neutrons

A magic number is a number of nucleons in a nucleus, corresponding to complete shells within the atomic nucleus. Atomic nuclei consisting of such a magic number of nucleons have a higher average binding energy per nucleon than one would expect based upon predictions such as the mass formula of von Weizsaecker (also called the semi-empirical mass formula – SEMF) and are hence more stable against nuclear decay. Magic numbers are predicted by the nuclear shell model. They are proved by observations showing that there are sudden discontinuities in the proton and neutron separation energies at specific values of Z and N. These correspond to the closing of shells (or sub-shells). Nuclei with closed shells are more tightly bound than the next higher number. The closing of shells occurs at Z or N = 2, 8, 20, 28, (40), 50, 82, 126. It is found that nuclei with even numbers of protons and neutrons are more stable than those with odd numbers. Nuclei that have both neutron numbers and proton numbers equal to one of the magic numbers can be called “doubly magic” and are found to be particularly stable.magic numbers - doubly magic nucleiThere are further special properties of nuclei, which have a magic number of nucleons:

  1. Higher abundance in nature. For example, helium-4 is among the universe’s most abundant (and stable) nuclei.
  2. At the end of the decay series, the stable elements all have a “magic number” of neutrons or protons. The nuclei He-4, O-16, and Pb-208 (82 protons and 126 neutrons) that contain magic numbers of both neutrons and protons are particularly stable. The relative stability of these nuclei is reminiscent of that of inert gas atoms (closed electron shells).
  3. Nuclei with N = magic number have lower neutron absorption cross-sections than surrounding isotopes.
  4. These nuclei appear perfectly spherical; they have zero quadrupole electric moments.
  5. Magic number nuclei have higher first excitation energy.

Neutron Star as “Giant Nucleus”

A neutron star is the collapsed core of a large star (usually of a red giant). Neutron stars are the smallest and densest stars known to exist, and they rotate extremely rapidly. A neutron star is a giant atomic nucleus about 11 km in diameter made especially of neutrons. It is believed that under the immense pressures of collapsing massive stars going supernova, the electrons and protons can combine to form neutrons via electron capture, releasing a huge amount of neutrinos. Since they have similar properties as atomic nuclei, neutron stars are sometimes described as giant nuclei. But be careful. Neutron stars and atomic nuclei are held together by different forces. A nucleus is held together by the strong force, while a neutron star is held together by gravitational force.

On the other hand, neutron stars are partially supported against further collapse by neutron degeneracy (via degeneracy pressure), a phenomenon described by the Pauli exclusion principle. In a highly dense state of matter, where gravitational pressure is extreme, quantum mechanical effects are significant. Degenerate matter is usually modeled as an ideal Fermi gas, in which the Pauli exclusion principle prevents identical fermions from occupying the same quantum state. Similarly, white dwarfs are supported against collapse by electron degeneracy pressure, analogous to neutron degeneracy.

Nuclear and Reactor Physics:
  1. J. R. Lamarsh, Introduction to Nuclear Reactor Theory, 2nd ed., Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA (1983).
  2. J. R. Lamarsh, A. J. Baratta, Introduction to Nuclear Engineering, 3d ed., Prentice-Hall, 2001, ISBN: 0-201-82498-1.
  3. W. M. Stacey, Nuclear Reactor Physics, John Wiley & Sons, 2001, ISBN: 0- 471-39127-1.
  4. Glasstone, Sesonske. Nuclear Reactor Engineering: Reactor Systems Engineering, Springer; 4th edition, 1994, ISBN: 978-0412985317
  5. W.S.C. Williams. Nuclear and Particle Physics. Clarendon Press; 1 edition, 1991, ISBN: 978-0198520467
  6. G.R.Keepin. Physics of Nuclear Kinetics. Addison-Wesley Pub. Co; 1st edition, 1965
  7. Robert Reed Burn, Introduction to Nuclear Reactor Operation, 1988.
  8. U.S. Department of Energy, Nuclear Physics and Reactor Theory. DOE Fundamentals Handbook, Volume 1 and 2. January 1993.
  9. Paul Reuss, Neutron Physics. EDP Sciences, 2008. ISBN: 978-2759800414.

Advanced Reactor Physics:

  1. K. O. Ott, W. A. Bezella, Introductory Nuclear Reactor Statics, American Nuclear Society, Revised edition (1989), 1989, ISBN: 0-894-48033-2.
  2. K. O. Ott, R. J. Neuhold, Introductory Nuclear Reactor Dynamics, American Nuclear Society, 1985, ISBN: 0-894-48029-4.
  3. D. L. Hetrick, Dynamics of Nuclear Reactors, American Nuclear Society, 1993, ISBN: 0-894-48453-2. 
  4. E. E. Lewis, W. F. Miller, Computational Methods of Neutron Transport, American Nuclear Society, 1993, ISBN: 0-894-48452-4.

See above:

Atomic Nucleus