There are two main experimental methods for fundamental reactor physics measurements: kinetic and static.

**Static methods**are used to determine time independent core characteristics. These methods can be used to describe phenomena that occur independently of time. On the other hand they cannot be used to determine most dynamic characteristics.**Kinetic methods**are used to study parameters (parameters of delayed neutrons etc.) which determine short-term and medium-term kinetics.

There are three main kinetic methods for experimental determination of neutron kinetics parameters:

**stable reactor period (or asymptotic period),**

**τ**

**, is defined as the time required for the neutron density to change by a factor e = 2.718.**

_{e}As was written in previous chapters, we can expect that the solution of point kinetics equation can be n(t) = A.exp(s.t) and C_{i}(t) = C_{i,0}.exp(s.t). In the asymptotic term (i.e., after the transition phenomena have died out) the asymptotic solution is in the form:

where s_{0} = 1/_{e} is the stable reactor period or asymptotic period of reactor. This root, s_{0}, is positive for ρ > 0 and negative for ρ < 0, therefore this root describes the reactor response, which is lasting after the transition phenomena have died out. The measurement of asymptotic period, can be used to determine (directly from inhour equation) the reactivity inserted to the system.

**rod drop method**belongs to a group of reactivity perturbation methods. This method is based on the study of the transient response of the reactor to a rapid insertion of high negative reactivity. This rapid reactivity insertion is usually performed by the dropping of the reactor control rods when the reactor is in a critical state. In this case the reactivity inserted can be determined from the measurement of the prompt drop.

As was described in the Prompt Jump Approximation, the response of a neutron detector (n_{1} ➝ n_{2}) immediately after a control rod is dropped into a critical reactor (ρ_{1} = 0) is related by:

which allows determination of the reactivity worth of the rod. The **rod drop method** is advantageous because it is very quick to perform and it requires no extra equipment. Moreover it can easily and safely measure large amounts of reactivity. On the other hand the rod drop method is associated usually with reactor shutdown and subsequent reactor startup. Also, the rod drop time is not instantaneous as is theoretically assumed, therefore limiting the accuracy of the method. In PWRs, the drop time of all control rods is usually about 2 – 4 seconds.

This method is widely used to determine the worth of all control rods (i.e., of an **emergency shutdown system**). This method can be also used to determine the parameters of delayed neutrons. These data can be obtained by decomposition of neutron flux coastdown.

A more accurate method is, for example, in:

Moore, K. V. Shutdown Reactivity by the Modified Rod Drop Method, USAEC Report ID0-16948, 1964.

**source jerk method**belongs to a group of source perturbation methods.But in principle, the source jerk method is essentially the same as the rod drop method, except that it is a subcritical measurement and the neutron source is removed instead of inserting a control rod. This method is based on the study of the transient response of the reactor to a rapid neutron source removal from a reactor.

In this case the subcriticality of the reactor (subcritical multiplication) can be determined from the measurement of the prompt drop. Also here the prompt drop can be measured because the delayed neutron precursor population will not change immediately. Following sudden source removal, the neutron population undergoes a sharp negative jump.

As was described in the Prompt Jump Approximation, the response of a neutron detector (n_{1} ➝ n_{2}) immediately after a source removal from a subcritical reactor (ρ_{1} < 0) is related by:

where n_{0} is the neutron level with the source in place and n_{1} is the neutron level immediately after the source jerk. Since a source is much smaller and lighter than a control rod, it is much easier to quickly remove from the core. On the other hand, in commercial reactors, this method cannot be used, because in commercial reactors neutron sources (when used) cannot be simply removed from the core. Moreover commercial reactors contains high burnup fuel which is very important source of neutrons.

See also: Source Neutrons

**Nuclear and Reactor Physics:**

- J. R. Lamarsh, Introduction to Nuclear Reactor Theory, 2nd ed., Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA (1983).
- J. R. Lamarsh, A. J. Baratta, Introduction to Nuclear Engineering, 3d ed., Prentice-Hall, 2001, ISBN: 0-201-82498-1.
- W. M. Stacey, Nuclear Reactor Physics, John Wiley & Sons, 2001, ISBN: 0- 471-39127-1.
- Glasstone, Sesonske. Nuclear Reactor Engineering: Reactor Systems Engineering, Springer; 4th edition, 1994, ISBN: 978-0412985317
- W.S.C. Williams. Nuclear and Particle Physics. Clarendon Press; 1 edition, 1991, ISBN: 978-0198520467
- G.R.Keepin. Physics of Nuclear Kinetics. Addison-Wesley Pub. Co; 1st edition, 1965
- Robert Reed Burn, Introduction to Nuclear Reactor Operation, 1988.
- U.S. Department of Energy, Nuclear Physics and Reactor Theory. DOE Fundamentals Handbook, Volume 1 and 2. January 1993.

**Advanced Reactor Physics:**

- K. O. Ott, W. A. Bezella, Introductory Nuclear Reactor Statics, American Nuclear Society, Revised edition (1989), 1989, ISBN: 0-894-48033-2.
- K. O. Ott, R. J. Neuhold, Introductory Nuclear Reactor Dynamics, American Nuclear Society, 1985, ISBN: 0-894-48029-4.
- D. L. Hetrick, Dynamics of Nuclear Reactors, American Nuclear Society, 1993, ISBN: 0-894-48453-2.
- E. E. Lewis, W. F. Miller, Computational Methods of Neutron Transport, American Nuclear Society, 1993, ISBN: 0-894-48452-4.